Supplementary material for ICCV submission 667:

Understanding deep features with computer generated imagery

Quantitative results for the lightning experiment of section 4.2

We present here the quantitative results for the light variation experiment. They are not used in the paper but the corresponding embedding is presented figure 4. Note that on the contrary to the other factors, the light is not well separated from the style. However, it is also considerably less important as the networks we studied is largely independent from lighting.

Results

car

< < < < < < < < <

light

pool5 fc6 fc7
Factor
Places 0.9% 1.1% 1.0%
5 4 4
AlexNet 1.2% 1.6% 1.7%
5 4 4
VGG 1.0% 1.5% 1.6%
5 4 4
Style
Places 75.4% 75.2% 76.1%
203 76 76
AlexNet 77.4% 75.1% 75.1%
181 115 115
VGG 73.5% 72.5% 73.5%
242 113 113
Residual
Places 23.6% 23.7% 22.8%
888 446 446
AlexNet 21.4% 23.3% 23.2%
798 671 671
VGG 25.5% 26.0% 24.9%
1000 726 726

chair

< < < < < < < < <

light

pool5 fc6 fc7
Factor
Places 0.2% 0.2% 0.2%
5 3 3
AlexNet 0.2% 0.2% 0.2%
4 3 3
VGG 0.1% 0.2% 0.2%
5 3 3
Style
Places 92.0% 92.9% 93.4%
500 240 240
AlexNet 93.0% 93.5% 93.8%
448 347 347
VGG 91.8% 92.7% 93.0%
604 296 296
Residual
Places 7.8% 6.9% 6.4%
1000 1000 1000
AlexNet 6.8% 6.3% 6.0%
1000 1000 1000
VGG 8.1% 7.2% 6.7%
1000 1000 1000